The Kelsicks is an independent Seattle practice for organizations and people who want technology to stop being a recurring mystery. I find the real problem, explain it clearly, fix it, and write down what your team needs to know.
The work is led by Izzy Kelsick. Twelve years in finance and public infrastructure — and current responsibility for the workplace technology behind roughly 15,000 Windows and Mac devices — provide the depth behind that plain-English approach.
I started in chemistry at Dominica State College, and finished in information technology at Borough of Manhattan Community College. It's a strange line on a résumé and it turned out to be the most useful thing about me.
Chemistry teaches one habit above all others: write down exactly what you did, in what order, in what quantity — because a result you can't reproduce isn't a result, it's an anecdote. That is also, almost exactly, the argument for managing infrastructure as code.
My first technology job was real-time support on a trading floor in 2014 — Bloomberg terminals, low-latency systems, and several hundred people whose morning does not tolerate an outage. You learn fast there that "I fixed it" is worth very little if nobody can say what you changed.
Large organizations often use one system for Windows, another for Mac, and a third for phones. Costs overlap, rules disagree, and nobody is certain which system is authoritative. I bring that work into one place and give the team a controlled way to change it.
In practice, that means every proposed change is recorded and checked. It reaches a small test group before it reaches thousands. If a change would suddenly affect every device, it stops for a named person to review — and if the system cannot establish that the change is safe, it stops rather than guessing.
The environment is also captured every night, with each change tied to the person who made it. There are more than three years of searchable history and 936 recovery points. If someone asks who changed this, when, and can we put it back, the answer should not be a shrug.
Most problems I'm called into aren't technology problems. They're a decision nobody recorded, made three years ago, that everyone has been working around ever since. So I start with a document — what's happening, what it costs, what changes if you fix it. Half the value of an engagement is over before anyone touches a console, because once a thing is written down accurately the right answer is usually obvious and the argument stops.
Contribution guides, script templates, runbooks, a recorded handover. The measure of a good engagement is that your team runs it after I'm gone.
When a build needs a box, you buy the box at cost and I show you the receipt.
— including when the thing you asked for isn't the thing you need.
MCSE: Cloud Platform and Infrastructure · MCSA: Windows 10 · Seattle, WA · View résumé →
I moved here from New York in September 2023, for my family. Three years on I still work New York hours, which is a strange way to live in a city.
The Kelsicks is partly how I'm fixing that — building something where I actually am, for people I'm going to run into again.
So alongside the enterprise work there's Small Systems: the same engineering, scaled down to one shop, one practice, one household. If your work lives on a hard drive that rides around in a bag, that page is for you.
Most organizations don't have a technology problem. They have an accumulation problem — another tool, another subscription, another appliance, while the original issue sits underneath, load-bearing and unexamined. The fix is almost never more. It's usually the thing you already own, set up correctly, with one clear place for everything to live.
I take on a small number of engagements at a time so each one gets finished properly.